Results: A total of 20 studies comprised of 5876 individuals were eligible. There was no heterogeneity for CRC, but adenoma and advanced adenoma harbored considerable heterogeneity influenced by risk classification and various
detection markers. Stratification analysis by risk classification showed that multiple markers had a high diagnostic value for the high-risk subgroups of both CRC [sensitivity: 0.759(0.711–0.804), specificity: 0.883(0.846–0.913), AUC = 0.906] and advanced adenoma [sensitivity: 0.683(0.584–0.771), specificity: 0.918(0.866–0.954), AUC = 0.946] but not for the average-risk subgroups of either. In the methylation subgroup, sDNA had significantly higher diagnostic selleck chemicals llc value for CRC [sensitivity: 0.753(0.685–0.812), specificity: 0.913(0.860–0.950), AUC = 0.918] and advanced adenoma [sensitivity: 0.623(0.527–0.712),
specificity: 0.926(0.882–0.958), AUC = 0.910] compared to the mutation subgroup. There was no significant heterogeneity among studies for subgroup analysis. Conclusion: Multiple markers’ sDNA testing had strong diagnostic significance for CRC and advanced adenoma in high-risk subjects. Methylation makers have more diagnostic value than mutation markers. Key Word(s): 1. stool DNA test; 2. colorectal cancer; 3. adenoma; 4. diagnosis; Presenting Author: ZIJUN LI Additional Authors: WENJING NIE Corresponding Author: ZIJUN LI Affiliations: Guangdong General Hospital Objective: To investigate the distribution characteristics and clinical significance of lipid Trichostatin A molecular weight metabolism in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: Total cholesterol (CHOL),
triglyceride (TGIG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) and apolipoprotein B100 (ApoB100) were measured in patients newly diagnosed with colorectal Progesterone cancer in Guangdong General Hospital during 2001–2010, and all the data were analyzed. Results: A total of 1557 patients were included for final analysis, of whom 807 were in 2001–2005 group and 750 in 2006–2010 group. Both CHOL[(4.56 ± 1.07 vs. 4.40 ± 1.08)mmol/ L], TGIG[(1.12 ± 0.57 vs. 1.05 ± 0.70)mmol/ L], LDL-C[(2.78 ± 0.91 vs. 2.57 ± 0.92)mmol/ L], ApoB100[(0.72 ± 0.25 vs. 0.76 ± 0.20)mmol/ L] level in 2006–2010 group were higher than that of 2001–2005 group. And there were no statistical differences in the concentration of HDL-C, ApoA1 between the two groups. The rate of patients with evaluated levels of CHOL (26.5% vs. 21.7%), LDL-C (24.0% vs. 17.0%), and decreased levels of ApoA1 (72.3% vs. 67.5%) in 2006–2010 group were higher than that of 2001–2005 group (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between these two groups in the level of TRIG, HDLC, ApoB100. Conclusion: Patients with colorectal cancer often develop lipid metabolism abnormalities. Patients in 2006–2010 had higher level of blood lipid than those in 2001–2005.