We have no data to address this issue, which may be a focus of fu

We have no data to address this issue, which may be a focus of future studies. The CCI has some conceptually common items with other measures (feeling as if the situation was unreal, CI994 emotional numbness and fear) and some related phenomena (feeling emotionally stuck and sensory impressions). It would be pretentious to address this as convergent validity, but the commonalities are great enough to warrant studying the relationship between the CCI, the IES and the PTSS-10. The correlations with these stress measures Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical were significant, indicating that the CCI can be used as a predictor for posttraumatic

stress after injuries. It might have been interesting to assess the convergent validity with other measures of peritraumatic responses like the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI). However, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the main focus of this study was the sensory perception. The assessments at two time points made it possible to study changes in perceived threat during the casualty chain. The level of perceived threat was moderately but significantly higher at the scene of the injury than in the hospital, but there

was a stronger explained variance measured Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in hospital. The mean score of dissociation and perceptions were quite similar at both measurement points. Measuring the responses in hospital seems to be sufficient in identifying those at risk of developing posttraumatic stress. Strengths and Limitations Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical The CCI showed strong internal consistency and a two-factor scale, despite the fact that the participants were drawn from a physically injured population with a broad range of stress symptoms. Accordingly, the instrument can be used in conscious patients admitted in the ER following a physical incident to see who may be at risk for subsequent posttraumatic stress. It examined a large sample from a region surrounding the capital of Norway. The duration of the threat was assessed by questions about the scene of the injury and

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical about the participants’ stay in the hospital. The participants completed the questionnaires some weeks after their accident. The time of assessment (weeks after the accident) raise questions regarding the CCI’s ability to identify patients at risk. Even though a recall bias may be present, those with symptoms after some weeks are most likely at greater risk for symptoms also at a later stage. Analysis showed no significant difference in others stress score (IES) between patients answering close to the accident compared to those answering several weeks after the event. This may confirm that the ability to remember feelings and responses in certain situations should not be underestimated. In the pilot study, patients were assessed within a few days post trauma while admitted to hospital. For most patients the self-assessment was difficult at this time point. Some were sleepy, some stressed and some were cognitively not able to concentrate. This was a major reason for postal assessment after discharge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>