Thus, viral Pellino

is a valuable experimental tool that enables one to evaluate the importance of the wing region in the Pellino FHA domain for IRAK binding. Since viral Pellino retains the ability to interact with IRAK-1 this argues that the wing region is dispensable for Pellino–IRAK binding. However, it does not exclude the possibility that the wing region may affect DAPT the affinity of the IRAK–Pellino interaction or mediate the interaction of Pellino proteins with other signalling molecules. It is interesting to note that viral Pellino can also bind to a kinase inactive form of IRAK-1. The latter would not be subjected to autophosphorylation and thus viral Pellino, via its FHA domain, likely recognises amino acid residues in IRAK-1 that are phosphorylated by upstream kinases such as IRAK-4. Given that viral Pellino lacks a functional RING domain, these studies are consistent with the earlier findings that the RING domain of Pellino proteins is not required for IRAK-1 binding 18. However, the RING domain of mammalian Pellinos is essential to promote polyubiquitination p38 inhibitors clinical trials of IRAK-1 15 and given its lack of a complete and functional RING domain, viral Pellino, proved, as expected, incapable of effecting any post-translational modification of IRAK-1. This is

evidenced in the present study by virtue of the intense electrophoretic streaking of IRAK-1 when co-expressed with Pellino3S (Fig. 5A, last lane). On the contrary, the viral Pellino–IRAK-1 association

leads to no such post-translational modification of IRAK-1 (see discrete IRAK bands in second panel of Fig 4A). As the precise functional consequences of Pellino-mediated IRAK-1 ubiquitination have not been elucidated and indeed may vary across the TLR family 30, it is not possible to say whether this divergence in activity between mammalian and viral Pellinos accounts for the inhibitory activity of the latter. It has, however, been Flavopiridol (Alvocidib) suggested that Pellino-mediated IRAK-1 polyubiquitination may have a positive effect on signal transduction by inducing dissociation of IRAK/TRAF6/TAK-1/TAB-1 complexes or through promoting IRAK-NEMO interactions 14, 16. In this light, viral Pellino may negatively influence flux through the pathway by competing for binding to IRAK-1 and antagonising the actions of mammalian Pellinos. Indeed, the present studies are consistent with a model where viral Pellino competes with mammalian Pellinos for binding to IRAK and in doing so inhibits polyubiquitination of IRAK-1 and subsequent downstream signalling. However, the expression of viral Pellino also leads to dramatic IRAK-1-induced depletion of Pellino3 and this provides a very novel mechanism by which a viral homolog can target its mammalian counterpart by promoting its degradation.