Some authors have proposed adding other medicaments to calcium hydroxide, such as camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CPMC) or chlorhexidine, so as to circumvent its limitations and maximize bacterial elimination 10 and 11. Although many in vitro studies have supported the advantages of combining calcium hydroxide with other antimicrobial substances 11 and 12, there is only limited information from clinical studies comparing different

calcium learn more hydroxide pastes 13, 14 and 15. The great majority of clinical studies evaluating the antibacterial effects of endodontic treatment procedures have been based on culture techniques. Nonetheless, it is well-known that culture has important limitations, including low sensitivity, misidentification of cultivable strains with ambiguous phenotype, difficulties in detecting culture-difficult species, and inability to grow many oral species under laboratory artificial conditions (16). Although culture-independent molecular microbiology techniques can overcome many of the limitations of culture, there are not many studies using these techniques to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of

treatment procedures. Also, most studies have focused on bacteria, which are the main microorganisms found in endodontic infections BMS-354825 cost (16). However, because there are some reports of the presence of archaea (17) and fungi (18) in primary endodontic infections, it seems interesting to evaluate the effects of endodontic procedures against these microorganims, in case they are present at all. This clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of chemomechanical preparation with 2.5% NaOCl as the irrigant and the additive

antibacterial effect of interappointment medication with either calcium hydroxide/glycerin (CHG) or calcium hydroxide/CPMC/glycerin (CHPG) paste during treatment of primarily infected root Sirolimus cell line canals of teeth with apical periodontitis. Bacterial, archaeal, and fungal presence was evaluated by broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and bacterial identifications were performed by a closed-ended reverse-capture checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization approach. In previous studies 7 and 9 we have used culture methods to evaluate these 2 protocols separately. It is our intention in the present study to refine and expand our previous observations on these 2 antimicrobial protocols by using molecular microbiology analyses, also including now a direct comparison betweeen them. This study included 27 patients attending the endodontic clinic at the School of Dentistry, Estácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro for evaluation and treatment of apical periodontitis. Each patient contributed 1 tooth, and selection followed stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria.