\n\nResults: Forty-three E7438 patients had missense changes (group A), and 14 patients had nonsense, splice-site, or frame-shifting mutations in the RS1 gene (group B). The mean best-corrected visual acuity was better in group A than in group B (0.34 and 0.21, respectively). Fundus examination revealed foveal schisis in approximately half of both groups. The bright-flash dark-adapted (DA) ERG (11.0 candela. sec. m(-2)) waveform was electronegative

in 62% of group A eyes and 100% of group B eyes. The photopic 30-Hz flicker ERG was delayed in all group B eyes and all except 6 group A eyes. On-Off ERG b-waves were subnormal in 39% of group A and 89% of group B eyes; d-waves were delayed in 14 eyes (group A = 10, group

B = 4). S-cone ERGs were abnormal in 50% of both groups. The PERG was abnormal in 88% of group A and 100% of group B eyes. A spoke-wheel pattern of high and low intensity was the most common FAF abnormality observed. The SB203580 cell line OCT showed intraretinal schitic cavities in the majority of eyes.\n\nConclusions: There is profound phenotypic variability in patients with XLRS. Most patients have DA bright-flash ERGs with a low b:a ratio in keeping with inner retinal dysfunction. Generalized cone system dysfunction is common and associated with an abnormal On-response and less frequent additional Off-response involvement. Nonsense, splice-site, or frame-shifting mutations in RS1 consistently caused electronegative bright-flash ERG, delayed flicker response, and abnormal PERG; missense mutations result in a wider range of ERG abnormalities.”
“Background: Apolipoprotein E allele epsilon 4 (apoE4) is a strong risk factor for developing Alzheimer’s disease Liproxstatin-1 order (AD). Secreted apoE has a critical function in redistributing lipids among central nervous system cells to maintain normal lipid homeostasis. In addition, previous reports have shown that

apoE4 is cleaved by a protease in neurons to generate apoE4(1-272) fragment, which is associated with neurofibrillary tanglelike structures and mitochondria, causing mitochondrial dysfunction. However, it still remains unclear how the apoE fragment associates with mitochondria and induces mitochondrial dysfunction.\n\nResults: To clarify the molecular mechanism, we carried out experiments to identify intracellular apoE-binding molecules and their functions in modulating mitochondria function. Here, we found that apoE4 binds to ubiquinol cytochrome c reductase core protein 2 (UQCRC2) and cytochrome C1, both of which are components of mitochondrial respiratory complex III, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 isoform I (COX IV I), which is a component of complex IV, in Neuro-2a cells. Interestingly, these proteins associated with apoE4(1-272) more strongly than intact apoE4(1-299).