In Mk-DI, immediately after the end of the learning phase, there was a transient period with a decrease in the number of grasped pellets (most likely due to a temporary drop of motivation), corresponding to a first plateau. Later, the level of score corresponding to the end of the learning phase reappeared, corresponding to a second plateau, which was considered for the data of the top panel in Figure ​Figure2B.2B. Overall, three monkeys exhibited a significant difference of manual dexterity reflected by the score between the hands, namely Mk-AN, Mk-CA, and Mk-MA. The

first one performed better with the left hand (P Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical = 0.036), whereas Mk-CA and Mk-MA were more dexterous with the right hand (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). Mk-AT, Mk-DI, Mk-LO, Mk-MI, and Mk-TH did not show any significant difference of manual dexterity between hands at plateau, as far as the total score is concerned. The CT data are plotted in the two bottom panels of Figure Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical ​Figure2B.2B. As the combination of movements required to grasp pellets were different for the two slot orientations, the CT was plotted separately for the full read vertical slots (middle panel in Fig. ​Fig.2B)2B) and for the horizontal slots (bottom panel in Fig. ​Fig.2B).2B). Overall, and as expected, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the CTs for the vertical slots tended to be shorter (less challenging task) than the CTs for the horizontal

slots. It is important to recall that the shorter the CTs, the better the performance. For the vertical slots, the CTs were significantly shorter for the left hand in Mk-AN and Mk-DI (P = 0.002 and P = 0.005, respectively), Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical whereas they were significantly shorter for the right hand in Mk-CA and Mk-LO (P < 0.001 for both). For the other monkeys (Mk-AT, Mk-MA, Mk-MI, and Mk-TH), there was no significant difference of CTs between the two hands for the vertical slots. Considering the horizontal slots, the CTs were significantly different Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical between the two hands for seven out of the eight monkeys, as only Mk-AN exhibited comparable CTs for the left and the right hand. In four monkeys (Mk-AT, Mk-CA, Mk-DI, and Mk-MA), the CTs were shorter for the right hand, whereas the Drug_discovery CTs were shorter for the left hand

in three monkeys (Mk-LO, Mk-MI, and Mk-TH). Considering both the vertical and the horizontal slots, note that in two monkeys (Mk-DI and Mk-LO) exhibiting a significant difference of CTs between the two hands for both slot orientations, surprisingly the hand with the shortest CTs was not the same for the vertical and the horizontal slots. Human selleckbio subjects The hand dominance was determined for the human subjects by comparing the total score (sum of vertical and horizontal slots visited in 30 sec) between each hand in the unimanual modified Brinkman board task. Graphs derived from one self-assessed right-hander (AG) and one self-assessed left-hander (AH) are shown in Figure ​Figure3A,3A, with the total score for each hand in the ten consecutive trials.