G103VfsX31, as well as the nonsense mutation p.W55X, are also expected to

result in complete loss of CTRC secretion, although direct experimental demonstration of this is lacking. Mutants p.K247_R254del and p.G217S were found to be catalytically inactive, whereas mutants p.Q48R and p.A73T exhibited measurable, but decreased, protease activity.36 We hypothesized that the reduced secretion of CTRC mutants occurred because of intracellular retention and degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) due to mutation-induced misfolding. If this were the case, the CTRC mutants might Selleck Luminespib cause ER stress and trigger the unfolded protein response, a signal transduction pathway aimed at alleviating ER protein burden and increasing ER folding capacity.69 Potentially harmful consequences of this signaling process are the activation of the inflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and the induction of apoptotic cell death. To test this hypothesis, we transfected dexamethasone-differentiated AR42J pancreatic acinar cells and freshly-isolated mouse acini with recombinant adenovirus carrying the p.A73T CTRC mutant.68 We found that the CTRC mutant p.A73T was intracellularly retained and degraded, and markers of ER stress (BiP Ferrostatin-1 research buy expression and XBP1 splicing) were

significantly elevated in cells expressing the p.A73T CTRC mutant relative to cells transfected with wild-type CTRC or a control adenovirus. Furthermore, we observed that AR42J cells underwent apoptotic cell death as a result of expressing the p.A73T CTRC mutant, whereas NF-κB activation was not detectable. 4��8C Apoptosis was related to ER stress, as evidenced by increased expression of the pro-apoptotic transcription factor C/EBP-homologous protein. These above experiments indicate that certain mutations, p.A73T in this case, can increase the ability of CTRC to cause ER stress and subsequent cell death by a mechanism that is unrelated to the trypsin-degrading activity of CTRC, but involves mutation-induced misfolding. Extension of these studies to

other CTRC mutants is necessary to test the general applicability of this mechanism. Taking into consideration the biochemical activities of CTRC and the functional properties of CTRC mutants, there are at least three mutually non-exclusive models that might explain why CTRC mutations increase the risk of chronic pancreatitis. These putative pathomechanistic pathways involve: (i) impaired trypsinogen and/or trypsin degradation; (ii) impaired activation of A-type carboxypeptidases: and (iii) induction of ER stress. While the first two models consider loss of CTRC function as the disease-relevant phenotypic change, the ER stress model is actually a gain-of-function model, as discussed later. Intuitively, the most plausible mechanism of action of CTRC mutations is through the trypsin-dependent pathological pathway, whereby loss of CTRC activity would impair the protective trypsinogen and/or trypsin-degrading activity of CTRC (Fig. 1).