2.4.3 Image Analysis At the core laboratory, volume-rendering images, curved multi-planar reformation (MPR) images, interactive oblique MPR images, thin maximum intensity projection images, and cross-sectional images were prepared using the images reconstructed in the image analysis center of a third party. All images of each of 16

coronary segments based on the American Heart Association Classification were assessed and classified by the Central Selleck PF-2341066 Coronary Visualization Judgment Committee, consisting of three independent radiodiagnostic specialists, as the image quality score: Score 1—motion artifact(s) present and impossible to diagnose; Score 2—motion artifact(s) present but diagnosable; and Score 3—no motion artifact and diagnosable. The image quality score was analyzed per subject, per coronary vessel (total of four vessels: right coronary artery, left main coronary artery, left

anterior descending, and left circumflex) and per coronary segment. The validity of this assessment (comparison with coronary www.selleckchem.com/products/cx-4945-silmitasertib.html angiographic findings) has already been confirmed by our phase II study [10]. Preparation of images as well as assessment of the diagnosable proportion were performed using a workstation Aquarius NET Server (Client PC networked with Aquarius NET Server) of the same model. 2.4.4 Statistical Analysis The analysis of efficacy and safety was based on the full analysis set (FAS). The changes in the heart Progesterone rate, blood pressure, and SpO2 were examined by t test. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. 3 Results A total of 39 ARS-1620 concentration subjects were enrolled and all subjects in this study received the study drug. During the

study period, two subject discontinued the study (due to exclusion criteria violation and failure of CT equipment). The FAS for the efficacy and safety analyses was thus composed of 39 subjects as planned. One subject who did not meet eligibility criteria was excluded from the per-protocol set. The analysis set for image evaluation of the mid-diastole images was composed of 25 subjects. The analysis set for image evaluation of an optimal image was composed of 26 subjects (Fig. 2). The radiation dose for the CCTA was 9.03 ± 1.27 mSv for patients. Fig. 2 Flow diagram of subjects 3.1 Baseline Characteristics The background factors and CCTA conditions of the subjects enrolled in the present study are summarized in Table 2. Age [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] was 65.7 ± 10.3 years. Heart rate (mean ± SD) immediately before administration of the study drug was 77.1 ± 9.8 beats/min. Systolic blood pressure (mean ± SD) immediately before administration of the study drug was 128.7 ± 15.3 mmHg. The number of subjects by CT model was 16 for Siemens (16-slice), 14 for GE (16), and nine for Toshiba (16), respectively. The number (%) of subjects with concomitant use of oral β-blockers was three (7.7 %).