6A). The decrease in proportion of CD25INT cells with a concomitant increase of CD25NEG cells was a trend observed in ten patients (Fig. 6B). In contrast, no significant change was found in the proportion of FOXP3+ Treg cells (Fig. 6B). These changes began within 30 min of IL-2 infusion, suggesting that the effect is due to direct rhIL-2 stimulation and not downstream effects (Fig. 6C). Since rhIL-2 binds to CD25, we wanted to confirm that the Selleckchem Etoposide disappearance of the CD25INT cells was not due to blocking of the anti-CD25 detection antibody by rhIL-2. We noted that preincubation with rhIL-2 does not interfere with binding of the CD25 antibody used in these studies (Supporting

Information Fig. 4A). Moreover, if rhIL-2 did block the CD25 detection antibody, we would not expect to observe CD25 staining on the Treg cells after IL-2 treatment. Instead, we observed an overall increase in CD25 expression on the Treg cells (Supporting Information Fig. 4B). This is consistent with our in vitro finding (Fig. 5D) and was confirmed with sorted cells (Supporting Information Fig. 4C). Lastly, we wanted to determine whether IL-2 immunotherapy Dactolisib modulated the CD4+ T-cell compartment in a transient or lasting fashion. Therefore, patients were evaluated over time after the start of IL-2 therapy, which was between 4 and 11 days after the final infusion. We observed that within a few days after the last IL-2 infusion, the CD25INT population

returned and remained at near pretreatment levels in four individual patients (Fig. 6D). In contrast, the Treg data were not consistent between patients. Taken together, it is apparent that the CD25INT population is differentially

affected by IL-2 and could potentially be playing an integral role in antitumor immunity in cancer patients undergoing IL-2 immunotherapy. Previous studies in mice and humans have shown that CD25 is expressed primarily on resting FOXP3+ Treg cells and transiently on activated T cells. Here, we have shown that a large proportion of resting CD4+ T cells in humans express intermediate levels of CD25 and are FOXP3−. We have found no mouse equivalent for this population when staining CD4+ T cells for CD25 and FOXP3 in our mouse colony in either young, old or tumor-bearing C57BL/6 male and female mice. In addition, when enriched resting CD4+ cells from Etomidate mice are stimulated ex vivo with low concentrations of IL-2, much fewer cells from mice upregulated pSTAT5 compared to human cells (7% versus 40%) (data not shown). However, there have been some reports of variable levels of CD4+CD25+FOXP3− cells in mice under certain inflammatory conditions, though it is unclear if these are activated cells that have transiently upregulated CD25 or represent a resting memory population similar to what we have found in humans [45-48]. Therefore, there may be differences in the expression and role of IL-2/CD25 in cellular immunology between laboratory mice and humans.