By region, LAIV efficacy estimates relative to placebo and TIV for children from Europe, the United States, and Middle East were robust mTOR phosphorylation and were similar to or higher than those observed in the overall population. LAIV efficacy in year 1 relative to placebo against all strains was similar across all regions. LAIV efficacy against similar strains relative to placebo in year 1 for children from Asia (71% [95% CI: 59, 80]) was lower than the efficacy observed

in the overall population. However, this difference was due to the disproportionate circulation of drifted B viruses in Asia; LAIV efficacy in children from Asia was 81% (95% CI: 67, 89) in year 1 against similar strains when drifted B viruses were classified as dissimilar. For placebo-controlled and TIV-controlled Epacadostat purchase studies, most regions had data from only a single study. Few data were available regarding LAIV efficacy in year 2 relative to placebo in South America and Africa, and few to no data were available regarding LAIV efficacy relative to TIV in Asia,

South America, and Africa. This meta-analysis is the first to provide a precise estimate of the efficacy of LAIV compared with placebo and TIV for children and adolescents 2–17 years of age, the age group for whom LAIV is approved for use. LAIV exhibited consistently high efficacy versus placebo and TIV against antigenically similar strains and all strains regardless of antigenic match. Not surprisingly,

efficacy relative to placebo was lower when measured against all strains regardless of match. This difference is largely attributable to the recent cocirculation of 2 distinct lineages of influenza B strains, only 1 of which is contained in the trivalent vaccine each year [23]. Because of antigenic differences between the 2 influenza B lineages, efficacy against Modulators opposite-lineage influenza B strains is reduced for all influenza vaccines; efficacy of LAIV in children against opposite-lineage B strains has been estimated to be approximately 30% [24]. LAIV efficacy relative to TIV was high when measured against similar strains (44%–50% PD184352 (CI-1040) fewer cases of influenza illness among LAIV recipients) and all strains regardless of antigenic match (48% fewer cases). LAIV efficacy was consistently higher than TIV in all studies and across types/subtypes. The only exception was that the available sample was unable to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between LAIV and TIV for antigenically similar A/H3N2 strains; this is in part due to the limited circulation of antigenically similar A/H3N2 strains during the 3 TIV-controlled studies. However, the efficacy of LAIV relative to TIV against all A/H3N2 strains was high at 55% (95% CI: 38, 67), due to the high efficacy of LAIV and lower efficacy of TIV against antigenically dissimilar A/H3N2 strains.