The results of MTT assay revealed that SMSP showed stimulatory effect at concentrations from 10-10M to 10-7M. Furthermore, at 10-8M SMSP exhibited the most effective stimulation manner. Instead, 10-6M of SMSP showed inhibitory effect as compared to the untreated group (Figure 2). Figure 2 Effect of different concentrations of [Sar9, Met(O2)11] substance P (SMSP) and SR140333 on proliferation
of T47D cell line. *p < 0.01; Δp < 0.05. Vertical bars indicate SD. LXH254 chemical structure proliferation inhibition of T47D cells by SR140333 was detected after the addition of increasing concentrations of the specific NK-1 antagonist. SR140333 showed the inhibitory effect in a dose dependent fashion at concentrations ranged from 10-8M to 10-5M, but 10-9M of SR140333 did not inhibit cell proliferation as compared to the untreated Selleck Ralimetinib group (Figure 2). As 10-8M of SMSP exhibited the most effective stimulation manner, we took 10-8M as the
most effective concentration to investigate. As compared with controls with H 89 mw SMSP alone, all cells showed proliferation inhibitory effect after administration of SMSP combined with various concentrations of SR140333. SR140333 inhibited the stimulatory effect of SMSP in a dose-dependent fashion. As compared with the untreated group, at 10-6M and 10-5M SR140333 could totally block 10-8M of SMSP induced stimulatory effect, and 10-5M of SR140333 showed inhibitory effect in the presence of 10-8M of SMSP. However, low concentrations of SR140333 (10-9M, 10-8M, and 10-7M) combined with 10-8M of SMSP still showed stimulatory effect. These results suggest SR140333 counteract SMSP induced proliferation in a dose dependent manner. Furthermore, SR140333 could block even reverse SMSP induced cell proliferation (Figure 3). Figure 3 Effect of SMSP (10 -8 M) combined with different concentrations of SR140333 (10 -9 M-10 this website -5 M) on proliferation of T47D cell line. The asterisk below the bars indicates p value vs. SMSP group whereas that over the bars represents p value
vs. untreated group. *p < 0.01; #no significance. Vertical bars indicate SD. Compared with untreated group (control), cells treated with SMSP showed growth stimulatory effect from the third day while SR140333 showed growth inhibitory effect from the fourth day. In the successive five days after the administration of SR140333, growth rates of T47D cells were not reduced to zero, though (Figure 4). Figure 4 Growth curve for T47D cell line in the presence of SMSP (10 -8 M) and SR140333 (10 -5 M) alone (evaluation by cell counting method). Both reagents were added respectively when the populations adhere to the flask. At different times, T47D cells were detached and then counted using a coulter counter. The results are shown as mean ± SD of four different experiments. Data of each day was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett t test. *p < 0.01 vs. control; #no significance vs. control. Vertical bars indicate SD.